Editorial standards
How Mani's POV Handles Public Questions
Clear sourcing, careful language, visible corrections, and responsible questions.
Policy
Evidence first. Opinion clearly marked.
This page is the public standard for how articles should be written, corrected, translated, and discussed.
Sources
Articles should separate documented facts from opinion. For public issues, the strongest sources are official notices, court records, public data, reports, named investigations, and direct public material.
Allegations
Allegations are not treated as final proof. If a case is under investigation or before a court, the wording should say that clearly and avoid declaring guilt without a final record.
Corrections
If a reader finds a mistake, missing context, broken source, or stronger document, they can share it through the suggestion page or email. Corrections should be handled visibly and without ego.
Translations
Language translation is provided to make public-interest articles easier to access. Automatic translations can miss tone or nuance, so the English version remains the reference text unless a manual translation is published.
No Rumours
This site should not publish harassment, doxxing, hate speech, private personal claims, or viral rumours as fact. Questions are stronger when they are tied to evidence.
Opinion
Mani's POV is personal perspective on public issues. The goal is not to claim final knowledge, but to ask better questions and learn publicly with sources.
Send a correction or source
If an article needs a correction, better source, missing document, or clearer wording, share it. The point is to improve the public record, not defend mistakes.